Figure 3 (A,B and C):Skinfold thickness reduction on
three out of five "low-responsive" skinfolds
Simultaneously with bioelectrical impedance and anthropometrical
assessments, we examined subcutaneous fat stores by plicometries. Results are expressed in mm, means ± SD
(at top). Only Tricipital (see panel A) and Subscapular (see panel B) skinfold assessments demonstrated significant or nearly significant differences by comparing group G2 and the control P for the effect of TREATMENT or the INTERACTION
(see statistical analysis details in the text).
It is also shown the data obtained for Suprailiac (see panel C) skinfold. Concerning these series of low responsive
skinfolds, no relevant difference between groups was raised after pairwise comparisons of each treatment
weeks' record with its corresponding basal value: by Scheffé test, * p<0.03, ** p<0.0005
|
 (Click
to enlarge) |
