|
Author:
Download the entire article in .PDF format
To browse comments on this article: | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Obesity is not just a matter of
being overweight. It is also hazardous to health. Obese patients are
more prone to clinical complications such
as hypertension, gout and the non-insulin dependent type of diabetes(125-
126-427). This is particularly true in those patients whose body fat is mainly located in the trunk region (Apple-shaped obesity) On the other hand, despite an increased accumulation of adipose tissue, some moderately overweight subjects do not show the classical complications of obesity. This is particularly true for females (mostly displaying a pear-shape of body fat distribution). |
|
Some diseases are often associated with obesity. The most important disorders where obesity appears to play a role in precipitating (or aggravating) the disease are:
|
Today's body conscious
society tends to discriminate
against obese individuals. This not only contributes to lowering
self-esteem, but it causes obese individuals to be more prone to bouts of
depression.(6-187-386-463-496).
Social discrimination and
obesity: Two studies found that notwithstanding comparable scholastic performance,
obese students are not accepted to prestigious colleges as often as their
normal-weight counterparts
(94-95-356).
Discrimination in the
workplace: A study by Roe and Eichwort, reported that 16% of employers would not employ
obese individuals under
any circumstances, and an additional 44% would employ them only under special
circumstances (390).
Another study revealed
that only 9% of individuals who enjoyed incomes between $ 25,000 and $ 50,000 were more than 10
pounds overweight,
whereas 39 % of those earning $ 10,000 to $ 20,000 were similarly overweight. Each pound
of excess fat costs an executive $ 1,000 a year (512).
The Police, Army and Fire Departments
do not enlist obese individuals.
Landlords are less likely to rent
to overweight individuals (252).
Almost twice as many obese women
experience bouts of depression as they rise in income class (compared to those who stay at the same social
level. (390).
In every aspect of daily life, obese
subjects are reminded they are not welcomed by their social milieu. Society
dislikes fat as much as obese patients dislike themselves for being
overweight. (271-405).
| Many obese patients, male and female, become upset when
they look at themselves in the mirror. This Body Image
Disparagement (BID) disorder leads to intimacy problems,
poor relationship with their environment, job loss, and
decreased self-esteem (455-458-459). Two studies reported that obese young women reported significant dissatisfaction and worry about their weight and the shape of their bodies. Klesges reported similar results among college students. He concluded these results may negatively affect these individuals' quality of life (494). Stunkard and Mendelson concluded "it makes no difference whether the person in also talented, wealthy or intelligent; weight is his only matter of concern, and he sees the whole world in terms of his weight" (460). |
Upper middle-class women are more affected, because sanctions
against their overweight are very severe at this social level
(441).
Adolescence may be the more delicate period
for body image disorders
(24).
Thus, constrained by a myriad of social and
subjective factors; receiving no solution to their despair; subjected to many clinical
complications, the strong become indignant and decide that modern medicine is a fraud and
their representatives are fools. The weak just give up the struggle.
In either case, the result is the same: further weight gain, resignation to an abominable fate and a resolution to
live a tolerable life during the short span allotted to them - a fight for doctors and Insurance Companies.
Weight control statistics
display
disappointing results. Treatment of the disease remains a mayor challenge
for Clinical
Medicine
(1- 2-12-37-42-54-55- 73- 91- 108-116- 135- 136-
165- 176-184- 193- 195- 203- 219- 220-228- 235-247-
259- 269- 299 - 300- 334- 343-349- 363-364-388- 389-
422-431-434- 443- 445- 453- 455- 459-
461-486-495-507-509).
Since no effective treatment has been found so far, several Investigators have
recently adhered to the nihilistic hypothesis that "no treatment is much better that
any treatment at all".
In our opinion, we did not reach our goal because:
1. For centuries,
obesity has been considered a
minor health problem and has not been given proper attention by the Medical
Community (179).
2. Highly refined foods
are easily available today. With these foods the digestive system is
spared of the natural and physiologic work that would otherwise be required
to get rid of useless extra calories
(358-360).
3. Tendency to inherit the genetic
trait of obesity.
"Obesity problems are perhaps not so dramatic as the problems of cancer or polio, but often cause life-long suffering. How many promising careers have been ruined by excessive fat; how many lives have been shortened. If some way - however cumbersome - can be found to cope effectively with this universal problem of modern civilized man, our world will be a happier place for countless fellow men an women." (ATW Simeons 1966).
The term Obesity derives from
the Greek expression: ob-edere, which means overeating.
For centuries, it was considered a matter
of gluttony, or craving for food, and women were preferred
chubby, because chubbiness was erroneously linked to a proper motherhood.
No longer. Many obese patients are rejected
by a society that tends to believe that the reason they are obese is because
they are unable to control what they eat.
Obesity, like fever and anemia, is a
symptom rather than single disease entity: a variety of causes for obesity have been identified in
humans and laboratory animals, but in the overwhelming majority of patients the etiology of obesity
cannot be determined .Since the underlying causes are poorly
understood, it follows that no effective treatment has been developed so far.
This is unfortunate, because
obesity is a very common disorder, shortening the life-span of millions of people
around the world
(421).
During the past fifty years, several
treatments have been presented as the solution to this problem. Some could be classified
as naïve,
others almost useful, and several as health hazardous. Nevertheless, anxious to find
relief, patients flock to Medical Centers, Clinics or any other
entity that offers a cure to their long-lasting health problem.
Unlike a fever, where a rise in temperature to above 100.4º or
102.2º C indicates the possibility of an underlying clinical
disease, obesity is more difficult to characterize. Several methods for
assessing the disorder have been recently published .
According to classical
height/weight tables, obesity can be broadly described as excess weight
as per the usual Life Insurance Tables.
This method is not a good
determination of body fat because it only estimates weight. Take two same weight
individuals: the one who tends to gain weight around
the abdomen may be at a greater risk
for heart disease and
diabetes mellitus than another whose fat accumulates in the femoral region.
Therefore, what method can we use to determine what makes an individual obese and another
normal-weight?
Obesity can be assessed from different perspectives:
The definition of obesity as an increase
in body weight has prevailed for many years as the most common clinical
tool. It is still being used, although it is not an accurate measure
of obesity (230).
Recently, relative weight
has become the most
popular and convenient obesity indicator. Relative weight is calculated
by dividing an actual weight by ideal weight according
to and individual's height, age
and sex. A relative weight of 1.20 or greater (i.e.,20% above ideal
weight) defines obesity (National Institutes Consensus Development Panel on the Health
implication of Obesity, 1985)
(230).
However, there are some problems
with real or relative weight. For example, a person may be overweight without being
obese,
and,
the degree of overweight at which an
individual develops a greater risk for cardiovascular complications remains
subject of
debate.
Besides, ideal weight
indicators for
specific populations have changed recently. We need to be aware of these
limitations.
Years ago, the Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company issued their Height-Weight Tables.
According to these tables, the risk of mortality begins to substantially increase at weights 20 per cent
above desirable. A desirable weight was considered a
standard weight for any given age and height. Several oversimplified
versions of these Height-Weight Tables
have become popular throughout these years
(318-319).
In these tables, the standard weight for a given age and height is based
on the weight that is associated with the lowest rate of mortality for a
given height. These tables have some limitations, however. For
example, since a table of standard weight is required to determine relative
weight, there is no single standard for all patients.
Another problem of these tables is that it is not know how closely an obese
patient must approach the standard to satisfactory reduce health risks.
| Currently, the Body Mass Index ( BMI )
method is
experiencing its heyday: this is calculated dividing weight by some power of height
(W/Hp). The power function p is selected for a population to
arrive at the maximum correlation with body fat and the minimum correlation with body
height
(263-295). When p is two, the result is the body mass or Quetelet Index (Kg per m2), the most commonly used weight-height index.(177) Body mass Index (BMI) closely relates to body fat, while being independent of height (40-263). |
Despite some controversy regarding an
index of 2 for the power function, a standard value of 2 is more practical, and studies
suggested that a value of 2 for p was adequate for men, whereas
a value of 1,5 for p was
preferable for women.
Since these calculations
need to be made every time that weight is estimated, nomograms have been published for
this purpose.
However, as in any mathematical calculation relative to an indirect evaluation of body fat, BMI suffers from some
inaccuracy (321).
All these methods - almost accurate
as they may be - should be viewed with caution: normal-weight individuals may show all the clinical
complications of obesity despite being of normal or less than normal weight
according to the weight reported by the scale.
This may be described as an excess of fat.
|
|
Accurate procedures to estimate fat belong to the realm of the Research
Laboratories. For example, determination of cytoplasmic mass from the naturally occurring isotopes, such as 40
K (316) measurements of the in vivo dilution of isotopes, like tritiated or deuterated
water (172-305) ; underwater weighing to determine body density (302-305); measurements of
total body electrical conductivity with electromagnetic techniques, computed tomography
scanning
(170), nuclear magnetic resonance, neutron activation analysis, dual photon
absorptiomethry
(84- 304-
315-501-504), and ultrasonography
(115). All these methods can estimate body fat with variable degrees of accuracy, directly related to performance complexity (134). |
However, these are cumbersome procedures , time-consuming, require highly specialized settings and
facilities and cannot be applied
regularly to larger research studies or populations.
What the clinician needs is
an inexpensive, precise, adequate method that can be used in routine
consultation: Click here for clinical methods to estimate fat content
Genetic influences determine whether an
individual will become obese, but many other factors decide if that
individual will actually be obese
(240- 241-257- 275-289- 320- 392- 418-
521).
There is a popular proverb says that no one becomes fat
under starvation conditions .
As far as heredity is
concerned,
several studies on families from adopted children and twins, concluded that a predisposition to
obesity may be genetically determined
(14-202-508).
Family studies reported that rough
heredity estimates ranging from 0.40 to 0.60, suggest that genes are responsible for
approximately one-half of the total phenotypic variation in obesity
(454).
However, both reports
reflect only the common set of genes that influence obesity during the ages
being considered, but do not reflect
the impact of age-specific genetic effects. Thus, they may underestimate the
total heredity of obesity at any given point in time
(64-65).
Despite the fact that genotype is determined by genes,
phenotype ( the genotype related to external factors) can be a determinant factor
in the genesis of obesity
(61-75-462-505).
Phenotype is strongly influenced by
environmental factors (such as easy availability of refined foods), that can
strongly
influence the onset of the disorder.
The obese phenotype is a
multifactorial trait, determined by genetic and non-genetic factors. Among non-genetic factors,
we could
include total caloric intake, composition of the diet, psychological factors, and
habit-modifications (quitting smoking, drinking, etc.)
(63).
It would be interesting, therefore, to
consider two kinds of genetic effects: the additive effect of genetics and the result of
the genotype-environment interaction.
Genotype account for a significant fraction
of the individual differences in Resting Metabolic Rate, Thermic effect of Food (TEF) and
Thermal effect of exercise (TEE)
Genotype-environment interaction accounts
for the rest in this equation.
It would be reasonable to suppose that,
given a fixed percentage of hereditary factors in the genesis of obesity, the
environmental factors of contemporary society play a key role in the ever increasing
number of obese individuals who live in industrialized nations
(58-75-133-470).
Despite claims that increased
physical activity may be a useful method of weight control, several studies
could not confirm that it is the key treatment for the disorder
(244-412).
The decrease in physical
activity observed in obese individuals could be related to adiposity
level. Basically, the
process of becoming obese requires an over-consumption of food and some basic regulatory
disorder, but once obesity is established, physical inactivity may contribute to aggravate
the disease.
That over-consumption of food is not the only
cause for the genesis of obesity was clearly demonstrated in a series of
research studies concluding that some volunteers maintained a fairly stable weight throughout the
study, despite a food intake well over
their daily requirement, whereas
those prone to obesity gained weight
(427).
However, physical exercise provides some benefits
in the management of obesity: It limits the amount of muscle tissue that is lost during a
weight reduction program; produces psychological benefits, including improvements in mood
and self-esteem, and prevents the urge to snack that is more prevalent
during periods of inactivity
(120-379-414-466).
Obesity and overweight are highly prevalent
at every age and in both sexes
(67-186). Data derived from NHANES 11 suggest that 32.6
million American adults are overweight as per the BMI definition. Of
these, 11.5
million are severely overweight (BMI of 31 or higher
(188-
245- 246- 337- 338).
It is estimated that in
the United States, about
300,000
deaths a year are caused directly or indirectly by obesity.
The frequency of
overweight appears to increase in frequency in the older population. Fifty
two percent of American women and 42 percent of
American men ages 50 to 59 are overweight, whereas the percentage for Americans
between the ages of 20
to 29 is 20. But the young are hardly exempt: 25 percent of children between the
ages of 6 and 17 are now obese according to any standard
(180).
Women have a higher tendency to
be overweight and obese than men. The NHANES 11 survey concluded that 25.8 per cent of American
women and 22.8 per cent of men are overweight, 24 percent of women and 22 percent of men are
obese.
Therefore, the prevalence of obesity among
adult
Americans appears alarmingly high. Men's and women's body weights have
progressively increased between 1960 and 1980
(469).
American adults have shown an average
weight gain of nearly eight pounds per person, with 33.4 percent now considered obese, compared
to 25.4 per cent in 1980 and
24.3 per cent in 1962
(469).
Although African American and Hispanic women remain
the groups most prone to obesity (48,6 and 46,7 per cent respectively), the largest increases
have been among white men and women: 7.8 percent and 9.1 percent respectively are
now more
overweight than a decade ago.
Many factors have helped to generate this
epidemic of modern society: availability of highly refined foods that spares
the human
body of the additional work to digest foods; the misconception that during pregnancy
there are two mouths to feed and a tendency to inactivity and
heredity tending to perpetuate obesity in future generations .
For example, the American food Industry
generates 3,700 calories a day for every man, women and child and spends $ 36
billion a
year to advertise its products
(469).
Up to 10,000 food commercials, specially
designed for children, are displayed every year : Nearly all food ads on Saturday
mornings are for sugary, fatty or salty foods
(469).
Concerning our tendency
to inactivity, Kelly Brownell concluded: "The amount of energy that people
used to expend even a decade ago is enormous compared to what they expend
today"
(258-469).
While an increase in physical activity
does not contribute to further weight loss, it elevates the body's aerobic
capacity,
increases the activity of plasmatic neuropeptides which creates a sense of well-being, and
replaces body fat with muscle mass (which is lighter, but has better aerobic
turnover rate
(74).
We ignore what metabolic processes lead otherwise healthy
subjects develop and maintain obesity. Therefore, we have outlined a
multifactor model encompassing all the known factors capable of
causing the disorder.
Each contributes to or aggravates the
condition and the condition becomes more or less severe, depending on the
number of factors
involved.
Thus, male subjects with hereditary
obesity traits, living in an industrialized country, subjected to different
psychological pressures and displaying the abdominal type of body fat
distribution, face greater health risks than female subjects, with no
hereditary obesity traits, and a gynoid type of body fat distribution.
As per the following diagram, all these
factors lead to the same conclusion: They aggravate or generate a subtle modification at the
hypothalamic neurotransmitter level, which in turn initiates an amount of
stored fat greatly exceeding daily energy requirement.
![]() |
For those of us who refuse to be discouraged there is hope. Buried deep in the human brain, there is a part that humans have in common with all vertebrate animals, the diencephalon. It is a very primitive part of the brain that, in humans, is buried under masses of nervous tissue giving us the ability to think, reason and voluntarily move our body. The diencephalon is the part of the central nervous system that controls all spontaneous body functions, such as breathing, heart-beat, digestion, sleep, sex, urinary system, autonomous or vegetative nervous system and, via the pituitary, the whole network of endocrine glands (32-35-113-158-159- 249-273-274-326) |
Thus, it is not unreasonable to
assume that the complex operation of fueling the body might also be
controlled by the diencephalon
(105-169-182-199- 242- 290-297)
It has been known that the destruction of
another diencephalic center produces a voracious appetite and rapid weight gain
in
animals that never become fat spontaneously (Simeons, Pounds and Inches)
(213-233).
The hypothalamus is the most studied and
best understood of all the Central Nervous System components regulating food intake and
energy metabolism
(70).
It has long been recognized that it
plays a key role in the mechanisms regulating food intake and fat
accumulation
(9-10-213-260-324-355-372-410-511).
Electrical or chemical destruction
of the
hypothalamic region results in hyperphagia and obesity, or decreased hunger, depending on
the anatomic area where damage has taken place
(438-448-449).
A laboratory lesion of the Ventromedial
hypothalamus (VMH) results in hyperphagia, hyperinsulinemia, decreased GH secretion, rapid
weight gain and obesity that persist until a new plateau in body weight is achieved.
By contrast, verified cases of human hypothalamic obesity due to tumors, inflammations or
injury due to surgery are extremely rare in the literature
(71-101).
Therefore, as we have proposed
in a
previous report, slight changes at the hypothalamic neurotransmitters level might
account for the weight gain that obese patients experience despite continued
efforts at dieting.
In fact, some publications suggest that human
obesity might be characterized by a subtle hypothalamic disorder, still not accessible to
current diagnostic methods. Indirect evidence supporting this hypothesis can be
presumed from several data:
(36-169-410).
Amatruda et al. demonstrated that a group
of obese males showed an abnormal response to 100 g. of GnrH (Gonadotrophin Releasing
Hormone), indicating a dysfunction of the hypothalamus
(15).
Jung et.al. concluded that women with
hereditary obesity traits display a hypothalamic function
disorder that is not totally corrected after weight loss
(248).
Kopelman et al., after investigating the Prolactin response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, concluded that hypothalamic
function is severely altered in human obesity
(273-264).
Although a hypothalamic regulation of energy
metabolism might be crucial in the genesis of obesity, the food-intake regulatory process
is a complex mechanism encompassing several CNS regions.
Destruction of various components of the
limbic system (temporal and frontal lobes for example) has been shown to cause obesity,
although these are very rare situations.
On the other hand, the hypothalamic region
receives signals from different regions of the body. Many of these
are mediated by neuropeptides
(78-293-332).
Regulation of eating behavior, including
receipt of the signal to begin and stop eating, is facilitated by a series of
gastrointestinal humor factors including Cholecystokinin, bombesin, vasoactive
inhibitory peptide, pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin
(437-491).
The administration of
Cholecystokinin has been shown to decrease food intake both in laboratory animals and
humans (367). Parenteral administration of bombesin decreases eating in rats, an effect
not eradicated by vagotomy
(491).
Regarding metabolic
modifications observed in obesity, changes in the concentration of plasmatic hormones might
also send different signals to the hypothalamic region.Thus,
an intracranial administration of insulin to rats and
baboons has been reported to decrease food intake.
Hyperphagia and hyperinsulinemia appear to
be two important factors in the development of hypothalamic obesity in experimental
animals. The later (hyperinsulinemia) seems to be essential for the development of obesity
in animals with a hypothalamic Ventromedial lesion
(70).
Since insulin is a lipogenic hormone, an
increased plasmatic level of this substance might account for the excessive fat
that has been observed to accumulate in cases of obesity.
Substances such as norepinephrine, serotonin, Thyrotrophin Releasing Hormone, dopamine and
neural peptides (b-endorphins, Cholecystokinin, dynorphin, enkephalins,
bombesin, etc. act as intermediates in this complex network
These substances might play an important
role also in the genesis of obesity: for example, several data suggest that
a CNS opioid system
regulates energy metabolism and ingestion of nutrients
(204-270-308-310-311-313-409-515).
ß-endorphin has been one of the most investigated
neuropeptides
(56-189-200-227-276- 278-296-316-330- 331-332-333- 368- 406- 407-515).This
molecule acts upon the mechanisms, eliciting eating through a food-rewarding
system. For example, food ingestion might increase CNS opioids levels
thus creating a feeling of self gratification. Obese subjects could, therefore, feel compelled to increase their food intake to
maintain CNS an elevated neuropeptides concentration .
Gluttony, as observed in obese patients,
would consequently be biochemically explained . Food addiction may be a
recognizable CNS opioid disorder
(308).
Gambert reported that fasting decreases the
content of hypothalamic ß-endorphin in rats. Therefore, food restriction, as observed during
dieting, might account for the feeling of weakness, hunger and physical distress
associated with a low calorie diet
(174).
Finally, some evidence suggests
that the diencephalic region plays a regulatory role on the mechanisms that
are responsible for the storage and release of fat
(98). Research on hypothalamic neuropeptides may shed
new light
on the interpretation of obesity, i.e., subtle biochemical modifications in the hypothalamic
opioids concentration may be the cause (or the indication) of an underlying
neuromodulator disorder
(99-109-406).
This would in turn initiate and
perpetuate the metabolic changes leading to the obese condition
(427).
Conversely, a persistent elevated food
intake could lead to metabolic modifications in the diencephalic region, as observed in
obesity. These modifications might be mediated by the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS), or
the endocrine system.
This system influences energy insulin secretion, which in turns affects the storage, uptake and expenditure of energy. Also acts upon catecholamines and other endocrine neural factors secretion, regulating energy utilization (79-80-181-183-236-237-287).
For many years it was generally believed
that the main cause for obesity was a glandular problem.
One of the suspected glands
was the
thyroid, because it was observed that hypothyroid patients showed, among other physical
signs, moderate degrees of obesity. However, recent research demonstrates that thyroid tests are within normal
limits in the vast
majority of obese patients .
In the few cases where thyroid
dysfunction appears to be associated with obesity, the condition may be easily
corrected with the proper administration of thyroid hormones indicated for the management of
hypothyroidism.
Therefore, it would appear that
thyroid dysfunction plays a minor (or null) role in obesity and only when
it is not
properly treated.
Adrenal cortical hormones
also have been associated with obesity. However, hypercorticism appears in a
few cases of obesity, and nearly
always in the context of an abdominal or android type of body fat distribution
(402).
Modifications of growth
hormone (GH) secretion
were observed in some obese patients
(57-77-156).
But it appears that this is a
consequence rather than the cause of obesity. Reports were published
regarding obesity treatment with Growth Hormone (92). This approach should be viewed with caution, since
prolonged administration of GH may provoke the onset of a Parkinsonian
syndrome
(342-381).
Furthermore, with a recent publication demonstrating an approximate 2-fold increase in mortality in critically ill patients receiving large doses of GH, the use of GH should remain in the realms of replacement therapy and research, until there are significant advances in our understanding.
Gonadal steroids do not appear to play a
role in the genesis of obesity. Rather, they are related to the peripheral
conversion of estrogen and testosterone, since this conversion is carried out mainly in
adipose tissue
(375-377-378).
Metabolic gonadal steroids activity might
account for the selective accumulation of fat in certain regions, as observed in gynoid
(Estrogen), or android (Testosterone) obesity.
Some would believe that the only thing that obese individuals need to do to
stop being obese is eating less.
After many years of experience on the
subject and a careful review of all the information previously cited, I have concluded that
this belief, reasonable as it may seem, is not the complete solution to the
disorder.
First, several reported studies
conclude that weight regain after dieting was the rule rather than the exception.
Next, it has been repeatedly demonstrated
that, under very controlled conditions (same Hypercaloric Diet), some subjects failed to
gain weight, or reported their weight remained stable despite broad changes in their food intake,
and,
Some obese patients failed to lose
weight despite following a strictly controlled diet.
No patient is so enthusiastic as an
overweight patient who is anxious to lose those unwanted pounds.
While some
patients are grossly obese, the vast majority of these present a
moderate overweight. The former are case
problems for General surgeons (gastric bandage, etc.) , since the disease usually recurs or
aggravates throughout the years.
Patients should
discuss the problem of obesity with their physicians. Both need to
understand what they are facing is a chronic problem like diabetes or
hypertension, that ranges from moderate to severe, and they must treat
the disease as a serious health hazard.
In any case, a pre-surgical
weight management program is likely to yield better results, both from
the patient's and surgeon’s viewpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
29/03/2009
|